Merchant of Venice and the Crucible Comparison

All communities suck in a motion successfully with qualities of median(a)ness and equality. The well- universe of the citizens depends on the moderate and guidance they procure from those with causality and influence in their society. When the people drive corrupt and start having intentions that do non contribute back to the society, the society ordain f every a bulge and be ineffectual to maintain balance and stability. In William Shakespe argons The Merchant of Venice and Arthur milling machines The crucible the reader checks examples of damage travel toed on the victims inside the walk internationals through the people with government agency within the friendship.The Christians in The Merchant of Venice mock loan shark the Jew countless clock while the mellowed greet in The Crucible intend citizens argon pr human activityicing witchcraft with out(p) a straitlaced testimony. In both situations, the Christians and the apostrophize see themselves doing the right thing and believe they ar bring to the society when in reality, they demolish apart the federation by persecuting those that are incompatible.The victims in William Shakespeares The Merchant of Venice and Arthur Millers The Crucible suffer from evil as designer being rigid in the wrong hands leads to the make-up of dyed termination, the particular put out ordain of citizens and severe punishments. The limited free allow for of the victims within the societies refer up to(p) to the manipulative mannerisms of the Christians and court subjects them to prejudice. The way the Christians hate loan shark makes him ask limited free get out in the Venetian community. loan shark is un adequate to(p) to interact with the Christians due to his reputation as a moneylender. moneylender is unable to choose his product line and as a moneylender, his only source of income is the interest group he gains from it, replying in the Christians hating him. This iniquity forces him to be shunned from society and he ends up losing boththing that he owns. The Jews only had moneylenders as their occupation and this wickedness forces them to be unable to relate and decease with society. I am as equal to call thee dog again, / To spit on thee again, to purn thee likewise (1. 3. 126-127) demonstrates the ab give moneylender receives. His limitedness in his occupation highlights the lack of orientation in their community and the privation to force those that are different away. Solanio is sure the duke will never render this forfeiture to hold (3. 3. 24-25) and as the play continues, usurer faces a losing battle in which the spot is evident in contributing to his destruction. He is faced with impairment every time he meets a Christian and this is limiting him in his performance in the community.Similarly, the court exerts limited free will on all citizens of capital of Oregon when they abide a devout Christian. All citizens need to be part of the theo cracy and if one strays away from it, they are charge of being interact with the devil. No crack in a fortress may be accounted abject (Miller 64) demonstrates the limited possibility of people in capital of Oregon to have another quality of religion. The index of the court forces those that were not part of the theocratic government to be eliminated from society. These are all landholding farmers, members of the church theyve k right awayn the women m either a(prenominal) years and never saw no sign they had dealings with the Devil should be summoned (Miller 86-87) shows how those that wanted to prove the innocence of the institutionalize are taken in to court to be questioned. Regardless of the many times the citizens of Salem tries to tell the court more or less the absurdity of witchcraft, the court would not see. stern Proctor goes twenty-six time in seventeen month (Miller 61) and it was not enough, therefore he is acc utilize of trying to cut the government.The in justice causes many people to conk out without being at fault. The flaws in the view of the government are evident throughout the play as the court refuses to listen and uses its power to determine the rules of society on its own. Due to the injustice in the communities of Venice and Salem put by the power in the wrong hands, severe punishments are pose on the victims. The punishments determined by the Christians chance on loan shark severely and he ends up losing all that he has.The injustice Shylock receives is more than enough to prove his persisting suffering throughout the play. Antonio calls him misbeliever, cut-throat dog, (1. 3. 107), demonstrating the abusive handling he receives as the Christians make sportswoman of him and throw hateful words at him. Shylock has no one to radix up for him, appearing alone in most scenes whereas the Christians always arrive in groups. This ganging up gives the Christians power over Shylock and when they use this power to hurt Shyl ock emotionally, the injustice and damage created is exponential.The court is already in favour to Antonio winning as shown by the Duke saw he thinks so too, / That Shylock but leadst this fashion of his hatred to the last hour of act. (4. 1. 17-19) the power is short and this ruling forces Shylock to surrender and lease his defeat. It is unjust for this to happen as Shylock does not get a fair trial and ends up losing everything. Likewise, the court overuses its power and ends up killing the entire community. The power of the court enforces theocracy to a degree that results in the citizens being accused of not followers them correctly and turning to witchcraft.John Proctor succumbs to saying he is associated with the devil and signs himself to lies (Miller 133) by confessing to an act he did not commit. The unequal treatment of the accused shows how the court enjoys abusing the abundance of power it has in its hands. The accused have no one to turn to and God sends his ten derness on them (Miller 129) when they admit to witchcraft. The court takes recreation in watching the citizens get accused and delved in the fact the power they own is essential in the sufferance of the citizens. It is this vicious act of the community that makes the entire community suffer.The punishments are apparent due to the contrast between the victims and the authoritative power in the Christians and the court, ultimately affecting the overall injustice within each society. When decisions are influenced and become one-sided, the opposite side of the party becomes affected. era one party might utility and receive a positive bias, the bring up will happen for the other, resulting in the victims being wrongly accused. The choices the Christians make end up harming Shylock when he loses all of his wealthiness and property and is converted to a Christian.The biased decision causes injustice on Shylock as he is shunned and hated in the Venetian community. As Shylock begins his noteworthy speech Hath not a Jew eyeball? (3. 1. 54) he demonstrates that he feels the same application and joys that the Christians feel and should be treated every bit but the biased views the Christians have of him eliminates him from any form of respect he deserves. When Jessica robs him and leaves with a Christian Solanio, pretending to be Shylock, cries out My fille O my ducats O my daughter (2. 8. 15) in a mocking manner, creating a bias on Shylock in which readers are able to agree with.Shylock is pictured as a cruel and spiteful character and as Solanio imitates him, no discernment is felt for his loss. The Christians are only able to see Shylock as the Jew and do not relate any emotions to him. Similarly, the vista of the court forces the whole town of Salem to follow suit. The young girls are able to gain power and with the help of the court, they are able to hang those they dislike. Their innocence and reek of vulnerability enables the court to believe and support them. Abigails name is good in the village (Miller 12) makes her able to easily accuse those not in favour with the court.The court believes her and only hears her side of the story, taking all that she says as the truth. Once Abigail accuses the citizens, their chance of salvation is next to none. Proctor stands up for himself, wondering(a) why they never wonder if Parris be innocent, or Abigail? Is the accuser always holy now? (Miller 73). The biased opinion of the court do many innocent people arrest to be proven guilty. The power of Abigail and her friends inflict injustice on the citizens they disliked, forcing many families to go bad in Salem.Their lack of consideration for others makes for a bias against the accused. The communities in which abused power is present as a result is torn apart, compelling the victims to suffer. The biased decision of the Christians and the court result in injustice in their society, playing a polar role in splitting up the commun ity. The formation of biased decisions, the limited free will, and severe punishments is a result of injustice in the communities when power is placed in the wrong hands in Shakespeares The Merchant of Venice and Millers The Crucible.The biased decisions of the Christians and the court help them to form favoured decisions and select one group over another. The limited free will Shylock and the citizens receive result in the lack of choices they make in their daily lives. The severe punishments the victims in both texts receive cause the injustice in the community to grow as those with power abuse their ability and use it to harm those that did not need to be harmed. The injustice shows the need to fix problems in societies, teaching one that power used properly is essential for a community to function.